top of page
Copy of Personal Injury Attorney Daniel B Reinfeld
LEBO REINFELDLAW LOGO

DANIEL B REINFELD, PA
South Florida Rental Car Accident Attorneys

Serving Clients Throughout South Florida Since 1999

South Florida Rental Car Accident Lawyer

Over 25 Years of Experience • Former Insurance Defense Attorney

Jury Trial-Tested • Millions Recovered for Clients

Daniel B Reinfeld, PA is a South Florida rental car accident law firm representing people injured in crashes involving vehicles rented through Enterprise, Hertz, Avis, Budget, Alamo, National, Sixt, Thrifty, Dollar, and other rental companies throughout Florida. We represent people injured in rental-car accidents involving negligent renters, authorized drivers, employer rentals, disputed EP, SLP, or SLI coverage, the Graves Amendment, negligent maintenance or entrustment, and uninsured or underinsured motorists. We pursue compensation through every available liability, supplemental, excess, umbrella, and UM/UIM policy.

Pedestrian struck by a motor vehicle in
Daniel B Reinfeld, PA is member in Multi-Million Dollar Settlement Association
Daniel B Reinfeld, PA is 10.0 Avvo rated
Daniel B Reinfeld representing a client during jury trial
Pedestrian accident resulting in serious personal injuries
University of Miami School of Law_edited

Rental Car Accident Lawyer | Finding Every Source of Insurance

25+ Years in Practice | Million-Dollar Jury Trial Experience | Former Insurance-Defense Attorney​

A South Florida rental-car accident claim can involve much more than the insurance identified at the scene. The negligent driver may have a personal automobile policy. The renter may have purchased Extended Protection, Supplemental Liability Protection, or Supplemental Liability Insurance. An employer, corporate travel program, excess policy, or personal umbrella may provide another layer of coverage. The rental vehicle's titled owner must also satisfy applicable financial-responsibility requirements, and the rental company may remain responsible for its own negligence. These overlapping issues make a rental collision different from an ordinary Hollywood car accident claim. Daniel B. Reinfeld, PA investigates the complete rental transaction—not merely the name displayed on the vehicle or the one-page rental receipt. Dan identifies the driver, renter, authorized drivers, titled owner, rental operator, protection-product insurer, self-insured entity, employer, and every primary, supplemental, excess, or umbrella policy that may respond to the loss.

Dan also brings an unusual perspective to these cases. Before representing injured people, he participated on the rental-company side of federal litigation involving the Graves Amendment, Florida's dangerous-instrumentality doctrine, the Commerce Clause, and the scope of rental-company liability. Those matters included Garcia v. Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc., Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc. v. Huchon, and Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc. v. Drouin. That experience informs how our firm analyzes rental agreements, corporate ownership structures, financial-responsibility documents, coverage elections, and asserted Graves Amendment defenses.  From the firm's Hollywood office, Dan represents people injured in rental-car crashes throughout Broward County, Miami-Dade County, Palm Beach County, Monroe County, and the Florida Keys. South Florida rental accidents frequently involve airport pickups, cruise-port traffic, tourists unfamiliar with local roads, business travel, hotel corridors, and high-volume routes such as I-95, I-595, Florida's Turnpike, US-1, A1A, Hollywood Boulevard, and the roads serving Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood and Miami international airports.

Why Rental-Car Accident Claims Are Different

The police report may identify only the person driving and the rental brand. It ordinarily does not establish who legally owned the vehicle, whether the driver was authorized, what liability protection was selected, whether the rental was connected to employment, or whether a separate company holds title to the fleet.

Major rental brands frequently operate through multiple affiliated companies. One entity may hold title, another may operate the rental counter, a third may administer claims, and an outside insurer may underwrite supplemental coverage. Florida law also recognizes fleet-title interests associated with asset-backed securitization. A complete investigation must therefore follow the vehicle identification number, title, rental agreement, corporate relationships, and insurance documents.

Who May Be Responsible for a South Florida Rental-Car Accident?

A Florida rental-car accident may involve several potentially responsible people, companies, and insurance carriers. The negligent rental-car driver remains personally responsible for causing the collision. The person who signed the rental agreement may also have contractual or legal responsibility, even if an authorized additional driver was behind the wheel. Personal automobile insurance issued to the driver or renter may extend liability coverage to the rented vehicle, while the injured person's own uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage may apply when the available liability insurance is inadequate.

When the rental was connected to work, the renter's employer or principal may be responsible under agency law or the course-and-scope-of-employment doctrine. The employer's commercial automobile policy, hired-auto coverage, non-owned-auto coverage, corporate travel protection, excess insurance, or umbrella policy may provide additional compensation. The investigation must also identify the vehicle's titled owner, the company operating the rental location, affiliated fleet companies, and any parent or subsidiary involved in owning, leasing, administering, or insuring the vehicle.

Optional rental-car liability products can create another important source of recovery. Extended Protection, Supplemental Liability Protection, or Supplemental Liability Insurance may be underwritten by an insurer separate from the rental brand. The rental company may also face direct liability when its own negligent maintenance, inspection, repair, or entrustment contributed to the crash. No single category applies to every Florida rental-car accident claim; the purpose of the investigation is to identify the legal relationships and every primary, supplemental, excess, umbrella, and UM/UIM policy applicable to the particular vehicle, driver, renter, and trip.

EP, SLP, and SLI Coverage

Rental companies use different names for optional third-party liability coverage. Extended Protection (EP), Supplemental Liability Protection (SLP), and Supplemental Liability Insurance (SLI) may increase the insurance limits available when a renter or authorized driver causes bodily injury or property damage. The product label is less important than the governing insurance policy, certificate, endorsements, and electronic coverage election. A Florida rental-car accident lawyer should determine whether the protection was included, purchased, declined, or bundled; identify the insurer and named insured; verify the liability limit and any required underlying coverage; and establish whether the policy is primary or excess. The analysis must also address whether the driver qualified as an insured or authorized operator, whether a claimed exclusion actually appears in the insurance policy rather than only in the rental contract, and whether the electronic transaction accurately recorded the renter's selection. The complete rental-car audit trail—including the reservation, counter transaction, initials, signature, timestamps, click-through screens, disclosures, declinations, policy certificate, amendments, and renter communications—can be critical to proving supplemental rental-car liability coverage.

Personal, Employer, Excess, and Umbrella Insurance

The rental agreement is only one part of the coverage investigation. The driver or renter may have a personal automobile policy extending liability coverage to temporary rental vehicles. A personal umbrella may sit above that policy. If the rental occurred during employment, an employer's commercial auto, hired-auto, non-owned-auto, travel, or umbrella policy may apply. Corporate rental agreements may also provide protection not visible on the consumer receipt.

Written coverage inquiries should be directed to the driver, renter, employer, titled owner, rental operator, protection-product administrator, and every disclosed insurer. Counsel should not assume that the absence of coverage on the crash report establishes that no policy exists.

Rental-Car Accidents Involving Unauthorized Drivers

An unauthorized-driver provision can create a coverage dispute, but it does not necessarily decide every claim. The inquiry may include whether the renter gave permission, whether the rental company knew another person would drive, whether state law or policy language extends coverage, whether the exclusion appears in the applicable insurance contract, and whether the rental company consistently enforced the restriction. A driver who leaves the collision scene may also create a separate Hollywood hit-and-run accident claim. The negligent operator remains personally responsible for the crash. Other personal, employer, household, umbrella, or UM/UIM coverage may also remain available even when protection purchased through the rental transaction is contested.

Tourists, Foreign Drivers, and Airport Rentals

South Florida rental-car crashes frequently involve visitors unfamiliar with local roads, airport exits, toll lanes, construction patterns, and traffic around hotels, beaches, ports, and entertainment districts. Foreign renters may not have a United States personal auto policy. Their rental documents may include liability protection packaged through an international reservation or tour operator. A renter may also be driving for a rideshare or delivery platform, requiring separate review of Uber accident insuranceLyft accident coverage, app status, and commercial policies. Cases involving Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International AirportMiami International AirportPort Everglades, hotel corridors, I-95, I-595, Florida's Turnpike, US-1, A1A, Hollywood Boulevard, Sheridan Street, and Stirling Road may require prompt preservation of roadway video, hotel or business surveillance, rental-facility records, toll data, telematics, and electronic reservation evidence.

What Is the Graves Amendment?

The Graves Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 30106, is a federal law that generally prevents a qualifying rental or leasing company from being held vicariously liable solely because it owned a vehicle negligently operated by a renter. It preempts state ownership-liability rules when the statutory requirements are satisfied. The law is powerful, but it is not blanket immunity. The defendant must establish that it qualifies as an owner or affiliate, is engaged in the trade or business of renting or leasing motor vehicles, and that the harm arose during a genuine rental or lease. The statute also does not protect an owner or affiliate from its own negligence or criminal wrongdoing. It expressly preserves qualifying state financial-responsibility and insurance requirements.

Dan's Participation in Early Graves Amendment Litigation

The Graves Amendment became law in 2005. Its constitutionality, reach, and relationship to Florida law were soon litigated in federal courts. While practicing on the insurance-defense side, Dan handled the first rental-company declaratory-judgment cases in the Southern District of Florida on behalf of Alamo and later Enterprise, including Vanguard Car Rental USA, National Car Rental; Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc. v. Huchon, 532 F. Supp. 2d 1371 (S.D. Fla. 2007), and Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc. v. Drouin, 521 F. Supp. 2d 1343 (S.D. Fla. 2007). The federal district court addressed whether Congress constitutionally enacted the Graves Amendment under the Commerce Clause. The Drouin published opinion identifies Daniel Brian Reinfeld among counsel for the rental-company plaintiffs. The related litigation ultimately reached the Eleventh Circuit through Garcia v. Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc., 540 F.3d 1242 (11th Cir. 2008), which upheld the statute and held that it preempted the Florida ownership-based claims before the court.

What the Graves Amendment Does Not Eliminate

Even when the Graves Amendment applies, it does not eliminate the negligent driver's personal liability or necessarily release the renter from contractual or legal responsibility. It does not erase personal automobile insurance covering the driver or renter, Extended Protection, Supplemental Liability Protection, Supplemental Liability Insurance, employer-sponsored coverage, corporate travel insurance, hired-auto protection, excess insurance, umbrella coverage, or the injured person's uninsured or underinsured motorist claim. A qualifying Florida financial-responsibility obligation may also remain despite the federal limitation on ownership-based vicarious liability.

The Graves Amendment likewise does not shield a rental company from liability for its own negligent maintenance, inspection, repair, or entrustment. Nor can a defendant claim federal protection without establishing the necessary rental or lease, qualifying ownership interest, affiliate relationship, and participation in the motor-vehicle rental or leasing business. The controlling question is therefore not simply whether the vehicle displayed a rental-company logo. It is what duties, insurance coverage, financial-responsibility obligations, and direct-negligence claims remain after 49 U.S.C. § 30106 is applied to the actual rental agreement, vehicle title, corporate records, insurance policies, and crash evidence.

Exceptions and Limitations to Graves Amendment Protection - Negligent Maintenance, Inspection, or Repair

The Graves Amendment does not shield a rental company from its own negligence. A direct claim may exist when a rental company places a vehicle into service with unsafe tires, defective brakes, steering problems, broken lights, unresolved warning indicators, or another dangerous condition that proper inspection or maintenance should have detected and corrected. Important evidence can include pre-rental inspection forms, maintenance schedules, repair orders, tire measurements, diagnostic data, telematics, recall records, prior renter complaints, branch-transfer records, post-crash inspections, photographs, and the damaged vehicle itself. A preservation letter should be sent promptly before the vehicle is repaired, sold, transferred, or destroyed.

Exceptions and Limitations to Graves - Negligent Entrustment

A rental company may be directly negligent if it knew or had case-specific reason to know that entrusting the vehicle to a particular person was unsafe. Relevant facts may include observable intoxication, inability to operate the vehicle, obviously defective or inconsistent identification, actual knowledge of an invalid license, warnings generated by the company's own system, or prior dangerous misuse known to the rental company. Florida law does not presently impose a general duty to obtain every renter's driving record merely because electronic searches are available. In Rivers v. Hertz Corp., the Third District held that a facially valid license and an undisclosed suspension did not, without additional warning facts, impose a general background-check duty. A viable negligent-entrustment claim therefore requires evidence directed to the particular renter and transaction—not a boilerplate allegation.

Exceptions and Limitations to Graves - No Genuine Rental or Lease

Graves protection depends upon a rental or lease. Courts examine the substance of the transaction, including whether consideration was exchanged. A purely gratuitous loan, informal permission, test drive, or complimentary bailment may fall outside the federal statute. In Romero v. Fields Motorcars of Florida, Inc., the Fifth District held that the particular complimentary loaner transaction before it was not a rental or lease. Later authority and Florida's specific temporary-replacement-vehicle statute significantly narrow the practical reach of that decision. Paid vehicle service, bundled consideration, a written use agreement, and current Florida statutory protections must all be evaluated.

Defendant Does Not Qualify as an Owner, Affiliate, or Rental Business

A company claiming Graves protection must fit the federal definitions and prove the required business relationship. Relevant discovery includes the title, registration, beneficial ownership, fleet-financing documents, rental agreement, corporate structure, and evidence of control among related entities. A brand name or common claims administrator does not, by itself, prove every statutory requirement.

Harm Outside the Rental or Lease Period

The statute applies to harm occurring during the rental or lease period. Disputes may arise when the agreement terminated, the vehicle was returned, the owner resumed control, or the vehicle was later used outside the transaction. A late return alone does not necessarily end the rental. The contract, extensions, payment history, termination notices, repossession efforts, and treatment of the vehicle as rented or converted must be examined.

Financial-Responsibility and Insurance Requirements

The Graves Amendment expressly preserves state laws imposing genuine financial-responsibility or insurance standards. It does not preserve a state rule merely because that rule imposes ownership-based liability. The distinction between vicarious tort liability and true insurance-like financial responsibility was central to Garcia and related cases.

Is $10,000 Available from a Florida Rental-Car Owner?

Florida Statute § 324.021(7) defines minimum proof of financial responsibility as $10,000 for bodily injury to or death of one person, $20,000 for injury to or death of two or more people, and $10,000 for property damage. Under Florida Statute § 324.031, financial responsibility may be established through a motor-vehicle liability policy, surety bond, deposit, or certificate of self-insurance. In Kumarsingh v. PV Holding Corp., 983 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), the renter was uninsured, stipulated damages exceeded the minimum, and the trial court entered a $10,000 judgment against the rental defendants based on the statutory self-insurance minimum. The Third District affirmed. The case demonstrates why a rental company's financial-responsibility documents must be obtained even when it invokes Graves.

The $10,000 should not be described as automatic insurance in every rental-car accident. The claimant must identify the responsible entity and the manner in which it satisfied Florida law. Liability, causation, and damages may remain disputed. If the company was self-insured, the certified self-insured entity ordinarily funds the obligation. If it complied through a policy, bond, or deposit, the applicable insurer, surety, or security may supply the payment.

What If the Rental Company Refuses to Pay the $10,000?

An adjuster's refusal does not make the claim disappear, but neither does it automatically establish bad faith. The injured person may need to prove the driver's negligence, causation, compensable damages, and the identity of the entity bearing the preserved financial-responsibility obligation. A lawsuit may name the negligent driver and the properly supported rental or titled-owner entities. The Graves defense and the extent of any preserved financial-responsibility obligation are ordinarily legal issues for the court. Disputed negligence, causation, comparative fault, and damages may require a jury determination. Any final judgment should expressly identify the entity responsible for the financial-responsibility amount; a judgment entered only against the driver generally cannot simply be executed against a separate rental company. If a judgment against the responsible entity remains unpaid, ordinary Florida judgment-enforcement procedures may include a writ of execution, judgment liens, garnishment, and proceedings supplementary. Continued qualification as a Florida self-insurer also depends upon maintaining the financial ability required by law. The appropriate enforcement route depends on whether the entity used self-insurance, an actual policy, a surety bond, or a deposit.

Rental-Car Accidents Across South Florida

A South Florida rental car accident lawyer must account for the place where the collision occurred, the law-enforcement agency that investigated it, the location of the rental transaction, and the county where suit may be filed. In Broward County, rental vehicles move continuously among Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, Port Everglades, Hollywood Beach, downtown Fort Lauderdale, Dania Beach hotels, and the I-95 and I-595 corridors. A local investigation may require a Hollywood car accident attorney or Fort Lauderdale personal injury lawyer to obtain records from the Hollywood Police Department, Broward Sheriff's Office, airport authorities, hotels, toll operators, rental facilities, and nearby businesses before their records are lost.

Rental-car collisions in Miami-Dade County may involve Miami International Airport, Miami Beach, downtown Miami, Brickell, Aventura, North Miami Beach, or travel between the airport, seaport, hotels, and the Florida Keys. The firm's location pages provide more focused information about Aventura car accident claimsNorth Miami Beach car accidents, and Dania Beach car accidents. Palm Beach and Monroe County cases can raise additional questions about long-distance rentals, one-way returns, corporate travel, international visitors, and where the rental owner, operator, insurer, renter, and witnesses are located. Rental crashes continuing south through Monroe County may also benefit from the firm's Key West personal injury resources.

Evidence to Preserve After a Rental-Car Accident

Evidence preservation after a Florida rental-car accident should begin immediately. The complete rental jacket and electronic audit trail can establish who reserved the vehicle, who signed the agreement, which drivers were authorized, and whether EP, SLP, SLI, or another protection product was purchased, declined, included, or bundled. The vehicle identification number should be used to obtain the title, registration, and fleet-ownership records rather than relying solely on the rental brand shown on the car or crash report. Driver-license records, authorized-driver information, corporate rental agreements, employer travel documents, and communications among the renter, rental branch, claims administrator, and insurer may clarify responsibility and coverage.

The rental vehicle itself may contain essential liability evidence. A prompt preservation demand should cover the event data recorder, telematics, GPS information, pre-rental and post-rental inspection records, maintenance and repair history, tire measurements, recall records, warning-light data, prior renter complaints, and photographs of the vehicle and relevant mechanical components. Crash-scene evidence may include 911 recordings, police body-camera footage, dash-camera video, traffic-camera footage, nearby business surveillance, witness information, photographs, and roadway measurements. The Florida Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles crash-report system may help locate the official report, while toll, parking, fuel, hotel, airport, and other travel records may help reconstruct the vehicle's route, the identity of its occupants, and the purpose of the trip.

Insurance and financial-responsibility evidence should also be preserved before a rental company or carrier narrows the claim to the coverage listed on a one-page receipt. Relevant documents may include the driver's and renter's personal automobile policies, employer commercial-auto and hired-auto policies, supplemental rental coverage, excess and umbrella policies, fleet insurance, self-insurance certificates, surety bonds, and deposit records. Delay can allow video to be overwritten, electronic records to be deleted, witnesses to become unavailable, and a fleet vehicle to be repaired, sold, transferred, or destroyed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue the rental company after a Florida accident?

Possibly. The Graves Amendment generally bars liability based solely on rental-vehicle ownership, but it does not protect a rental company from its own negligence or eliminate genuine financial-responsibility, insurance, or contractual obligations. The titled owner, rental transaction, coverage, maintenance history, and facts of the crash must be investigated.

Does the rental company automatically owe $10,000?

No. Kumarsingh affirmed a $10,000 judgment under the particular self-insurance and stipulated-damages circumstances presented there. A current claim still requires analysis of liability, damages, vehicle ownership, and the owner's method of satisfying Florida's financial-responsibility law.

What is Supplemental Liability Protection?

SLP or SLI is optional third-party liability protection that may increase the amount available for injuries or property damage caused by the renter or authorized driver. Limits, insured drivers, exclusions, and whether coverage is primary or excess depend on the actual policy and certificate. If those limits are inadequate, every potentially applicable South Florida UM/UIM policy should also be reviewed.

Does a collision-damage waiver compensate someone injured by the renter?

Usually not. CDW or LDW principally concerns physical damage to or loss of the rented vehicle. Third-party bodily-injury liability is a separate coverage question.

Can the renter's personal insurance cover the accident?

It may. Many personal auto policies extend liability coverage to a temporary substitute or rental vehicle, but the policy terms, driver status, household relationships, exclusions, and other-insurance provisions must be reviewed.

Can an employer be responsible?

Yes, when the driver was acting in the course and scope of employment or another agency relationship applies. Employer-sponsored travel, hired-auto, non-owned-auto, commercial automobile, and umbrella coverage may also be relevant.

Does Graves protect negligent vehicle maintenance?

No. The statute does not protect the owner or affiliate from its own negligence. The claimant must still prove a negligent inspection, maintenance, or repair failure and connect that failure to the collision and resulting harm.

What if the rental company calls itself immune and closes the claim?

An adjuster's characterization is not a court ruling. Counsel can investigate whether every Graves element is satisfied, identify direct-negligence theories, demand the complete insurance and financial-responsibility record, and pursue the negligent driver and other available coverage.

Why Hire Daniel B. Reinfeld for a South Florida Rental-Car Accident Claim?

Daniel B. Reinfeld is a South Florida rental car accident lawyer with more than 25 years of litigation experience, including approximately six years representing insurance interests before he began representing injured people and policyholders. His defense-side work included participation in significant early federal Graves Amendment litigation involving Garcia, Huchon, and Drouin. He understands how rental companies analyze ownership, federal preemption, financial responsibility, direct negligence, and insurance coverage because he has worked on these issues from the other side.

Dan personally evaluates and handles every case accepted by the firm. He investigates the complete rental and insurance transaction, identifies potential defendants and coverage layers, preserves evidence, and prepares the claim for litigation when necessary.

Speak Directly With a South Florida Rental Car Accident Lawyer

If you were injured by a driver operating a rental vehicle in Hollywood, Fort Lauderdale, Dania Beach, Aventura, Broward County, Miami-Dade County, Palm Beach County, Monroe County, the Florida Keys, or elsewhere in South Florida, contact Daniel B. Reinfeld, PA for a free consultation. You will speak directly with Dan—not a call center or intake department. The firm also investigates crashes involving rental trucks and other commercial vehicles as part of its Florida truck accident practiceFREE consultations available by telephone, Zoom video conference, hospital visit, or home visit when appropriate.  No attorney’s fee unless a recovery is obtained. Evening and weekend appointments available.  

CALL Dan:  📞 (954) 923-6110

Reinfeld Law

Directions to Our Hollywood, FL Office

From I-95: Take the Hollywood Boulevard exit and head east toward downtown Hollywood. Continue through Hollywood City Hall Circle. Our office will be on your right, immediately after the circle.

From Young Circle and Downtown Hollywood: Head west on Hollywood Boulevard for approximately seven blocks. Our office will be on your left, near South 25th Avenue and immediately before Hollywood City Hall Circle.

From Hollywood Beach: Take Hollywood Boulevard west from A1A, continue through downtown and Young Circle, and proceed approximately seven blocks. Our office will be on your left, shortly before Hollywood City Hall Circle.

bottom of page